![]() ![]() For better or for worse, Viking has introduced a new formula to replace the old – and wants to be judged on those merits. The loss of this old formula is not an accident, but a price deliberately paid. With the rate that the game is receiving patches, it's possible that much of this critique won't be very relevant in a month, but we had to draw the line somewhere. In his review, he finds Viking to be a solid historical roleplaying experience, unfortunately let down by severe balance and difficulty curve issues. For that, we enlisted the esteemed Tigranes, who proved himself with his Tyranny review back in January. Be that as it may, Viking is one of the few significant traditional RPG releases of early 2017 and it deserves a thorough review. That choice of setting does seem to have helped it sell decently enough for an indie title, despite a notoriously buggy launch. In the post-Skyrim era, its choice of setting was viewed by many as cliched and unambitious compared to its predecessor, Expeditions: Conquistador, even as they conceded that it looked like a solid product. ![]() Over the course of its 2+ year long development, I couldn't help but feel that the Codex community was turning its nose up at Expeditions: Viking.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |